Why are pro choice people so angry?
Why are pro choice people so angry?
I was watching the news after Roe was overturned and in the midst of a loud angry crowd was a blue haired woman waving a sign that said my body, my choice. What struck me was her rage. She was yelling and getting in the faces of Pro life people and attempting to tear down signs. She looked scary crazy.
What thoughts fueled this blind rage? Maybe the idea I can do whatever I want because my feelings are more important than anyone else’s. Or being able to do whatever I want when I want are my rights because pleasing myself is all that is important. I will live the life I choose even if it means having an abortion.
Why are they thinking like this? Narcissism comes to mind. When people grow up getting whatever they want and never being corrected they can develop an attitude and belief that they are somehow special and above everyone. They may also be sociopathic in the way they lack empathy toward most people.
They can never be wrong about anything and any disagreement is taken personally. Growing up they become experts in manipulation and intimidation. They feel they are much smarter than others and this gives them the right to tell people what to think. Many Pro Choice advocates are not interested in honest debate but simply want to exert their power. The truth doesn’t matter to them.
Another possibility is psychosis, yes psychosis. The National Institute of Mental Health says a person can have psychosis and never be diagnosed as schizophrenic or having a mental disorder. Instead it can be caused by lack of sleep, underlying medical conditions, prescription medicine, alcohol, illicit drugs and marijuana. All of these exist on most college campuses.
Now consider this definition of mass psychosis on Google. “Mass formation psychosis is when a large part of society focuses its attention to a leader or leaders or a series of events and their attention focuses on one small point or issue. Followers can be hypnotized and led anywhere, regardless of data proving otherwise.”
Many children grow up in broken homes and spend a lot of time alone on their computers cruising the internet and social media. They take in all kinds of information and images and, unable to process it, develop anxiety and distorted ideas and attitudes. The family is dysfunctional and the child is raised on peer pressure and the internet. Going to college the teenager is functionally an orphan.
At college the pattern is repeated except the teenager might develop a strong bond with a professor that becomes a parent figure. Because the real parents were absent, he or she has no internal values and probably weak critical thinking skills. With no mental filters they believe everything the professor and friends are telling them. Add lack of sleep, alcohol and illicit drugs and a perfect environment is created for psychosis.
How did we get into this situation? I have a theory that many of the causes originated in the fifties and came to fruition in the sixties. Baby boomers of whom I’m a member were born between 1946 and 1964. Could they have passed down their attitudes and beliefs to their grandchildren who are in the pro choice movement?
Could they have suffered from psychosis and could there have been areas in the country of mass psychosis? There was fear of the atom bomb beginning in the 1950s and simmering racial tension then after 1963 with President Kennedy’s assassination there was non stop political and social unrest plus the Vietnam War. Kids didn’t believe their parents anymore and some were dropping out of society to live in communes. Drug use became widespread.
Does psychosis or even mass psychosis seem like such a far fetched idea for many baby boomers at that time? Many felt the older generation and all it stood for had to be dismantled and society had to be radically changed. Was this caused by charismatic counter culture heroes and professors who replaced their parents and effectively brainwashed them?
Look at the way pro choice people act at demonstrations now and the way their grandparents acted at some of the demonstrations of their day. Do you see a connection? Were there people and powers behind the curtain instigating and orchestrating the chaos then and for what end? Are they still in power today? What do you think?